Extended Data Figure 1 |Protein identification by immunoblotting, enriching active telomerase, substrate pre-binding, and comparison of wild-type (WT), ΔTCAB1, and TERT-hTRmin RNPs.
a, Immunoblotting of TERT, TCAB1, dyskerin, GAR1, NHP2 and NOP10 in telomerase purified after CHAPS lysis protocol as shown in . We used primary antibodies against each protein, except ZZ-SS-TERT, for which we used rabbit IgG. Due to the wide range of the molecular weights of the proteins in our sample, TERT, TCAB1, dyskerin and GAR1 were detected in one blot, while NHP2 and NOP10 were detected in a separate blot. The use of the same sample to probe all proteins was performed only once, but TERT, dyskerin and TCAB1 were also probed individually twice. b, Silver-stained SDS-PAGE gel of purified telomerase fractions obtained from adherent cells lysed using the hypotonic lysis method that enriches active telomerase. This experiment was repeated over five times with similar results. c, Direct primer-extension assays of the purified telomerase fractions shown in b, confirming that E1 is no longer inactive (left panel), and of the substrate-bound purified telomerase fractions with additional DNA substrate omitted from the assays (right panel). The activity observed confirmed that purified telomerase contains the DNA substrate. The activity assays with substrate added were repeated over five times and the activity assays with substrate pre-bound were repeated twice. All repeats showed similar results. d, Silver-stained SDS-PAGE gel of purified intact and ΔTCAB1 telomerase and TERT-hTRmin telomerase prepared for subunit assignments. This experiment was done only once to provide a direct comparison between these different purified telomerase complexes. e, f, g, Negative-stained 2D class averages of intact and ΔTCAB1 telomerase and TERT-hTRmin, respectively. h, Comparison of representative 2D class averages intact and ΔTCAB1 and TERT-hTRmin showing the inferred localization of TCAB1 and TERT. For gel source data, see .