Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 18

1.

Object Vision in a Structured World.

Kaiser D, Quek GL, Cichy RM, Peelen MV.

Trends Cogn Sci. 2019 Aug;23(8):672-685. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.04.013. Epub 2019 May 27. Review.

2.

MEG sensor patterns reflect perceptual but not categorical similarity of animate and inanimate objects.

Proklova D, Kaiser D, Peelen MV.

Neuroimage. 2019 Jun;193:167-177. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.03.028. Epub 2019 Mar 15.

3.

The time course of spatial attention during naturalistic visual search.

Battistoni E, Kaiser D, Hickey C, Peelen MV.

Cortex. 2018 Nov 28. pii: S0010-9452(18)30397-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.11.018. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
30563703
4.

Typical visual-field locations facilitate access to awareness for everyday objects.

Kaiser D, Cichy RM.

Cognition. 2018 Nov;180:118-122. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.07.009. Epub 2018 Jul 17.

5.

Typical visual-field locations enhance processing in object-selective channels of human occipital cortex.

Kaiser D, Cichy RM.

J Neurophysiol. 2018 Aug 1;120(2):848-853. doi: 10.1152/jn.00229.2018. Epub 2018 May 16.

6.

Typical retinotopic locations impact the time course of object coding.

Kaiser D, Moeskops MM, Cichy RM.

Neuroimage. 2018 Aug 1;176:372-379. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.05.006. Epub 2018 May 4.

PMID:
29733954
7.

Transformation from independent to integrative coding of multi-object arrangements in human visual cortex.

Kaiser D, Peelen MV.

Neuroimage. 2018 Apr 1;169:334-341. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.12.065. Epub 2017 Dec 22.

8.

Facing a Regular World: How Spatial Object Structure Shapes Visual Processing.

Kaiser D, Haselhuhn T.

J Neurosci. 2017 Feb 22;37(8):1965-1967. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3441-16.2017. No abstract available.

9.

The Neural Dynamics of Attentional Selection in Natural Scenes.

Kaiser D, Oosterhof NN, Peelen MV.

J Neurosci. 2016 Oct 12;36(41):10522-10528.

10.

Disentangling Representations of Object Shape and Object Category in Human Visual Cortex: The Animate-Inanimate Distinction.

Proklova D, Kaiser D, Peelen MV.

J Cogn Neurosci. 2016 May;28(5):680-92. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00924. Epub 2016 Jan 14.

11.

Shape-independent object category responses revealed by MEG and fMRI decoding.

Kaiser D, Azzalini DC, Peelen MV.

J Neurophysiol. 2016 Apr;115(4):2246-50. doi: 10.1152/jn.01074.2015. Epub 2016 Jan 6.

12.

Interobject grouping facilitates visual awareness.

Stein T, Kaiser D, Peelen MV.

J Vis. 2015;15(8):10. doi: 10.1167/15.8.10.

PMID:
26114673
13.

Real-world spatial regularities affect visual working memory for objects.

Kaiser D, Stein T, Peelen MV.

Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Dec;22(6):1784-90. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0833-4.

PMID:
25896215
14.

Reward guides attention to object categories in real-world scenes.

Hickey C, Kaiser D, Peelen MV.

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2015 Apr;144(2):264-73. doi: 10.1037/a0038627. Epub 2015 Jan 5.

15.

Object grouping based on real-world regularities facilitates perception by reducing competitive interactions in visual cortex.

Kaiser D, Stein T, Peelen MV.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jul 29;111(30):11217-22. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1400559111. Epub 2014 Jul 14.

16.

Whole person-evoked fMRI activity patterns in human fusiform gyrus are accurately modeled by a linear combination of face- and body-evoked activity patterns.

Kaiser D, Strnad L, Seidl KN, Kastner S, Peelen MV.

J Neurophysiol. 2014 Jan;111(1):82-90. doi: 10.1152/jn.00371.2013. Epub 2013 Oct 9.

17.

Repetition probability does not affect fMRI repetition suppression for objects.

Kovács G, Kaiser D, Kaliukhovich DA, Vidnyánszky Z, Vogels R.

J Neurosci. 2013 Jun 5;33(23):9805-12. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3423-12.2013.

18.

Neural correlates of priming and adaptation in familiar face perception.

Walther C, Schweinberger SR, Kaiser D, Kovács G.

Cortex. 2013 Jul-Aug;49(7):1963-77. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2012.08.012. Epub 2012 Sep 3.

PMID:
23021070

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center