Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 1 to 20 of 108

1.

It takes a community to conceive: an analysis of the scope, nature and accuracy of online sources of health information for couples trying to conceive.

Kedzior SGE, Bianco-Miotto T, Breen J, Diener KR, Donnelley M, Dunning KR, Penno MAS, Schjenken JE, Sharkey DJ, Hodyl NA, Fullston T, Gardiner M, Brown HM, Rumbold AR.

Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2019 Oct 5;9:48-63. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2019.08.004. eCollection 2019 Dec.

2.

Patient perceptions and understanding of treatment instructions for ovarian stimulation during infertility treatment.

Barrière P, Avril C, Benmahmoud-Zoubir A, Bénard N, Dejager S.

Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2019 Oct 5;9:37-47. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2019.08.003. eCollection 2019 Dec.

3.

Applications to statutory donor registers in Victoria, Australia: information sought and expectations of contact.

Dempsey D, Kelly F, Horsfall B, Hammarberg K, Bourne K, Johnson L.

Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2019 Sep 4;9:28-36. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2019.08.002. eCollection 2019 Dec.

4.

A wonderful experience or a frightening commitment? An exploration of men's reasons to (not) have children.

Bodin M, Plantin L, Elmerstig E.

Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2019 Nov 22;9:19-27. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2019.11.002. eCollection 2019 Dec.

5.

Knowledge and attitudes of subfertile couples towards disposition of supernumerary cryopreserved embryos: an Indian perspective.

Chandy A, Waanbah B, Yadav B, Kunjummen AT, Riley DJS, Kamath MS.

Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2019 Oct 27;9:11-16. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2019.10.002. eCollection 2019 Dec.

6.

Societal pressures and procreative preferences for gay fathers successfully pursuing parenthood through IVF and gestational carriers.

Lindheim SR, Madeira JL, Ludwin A, Kemner E, Parry JP, Sylvestre G, Pennings G.

Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2019 Oct 26;9:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2019.09.001. eCollection 2019 Dec.

7.

Managing absence and presence of child-parent resemblance: a challenge for heterosexual couples following sperm donation.

Isaksson S, Sydsjö G, Skoog Svanberg A, Lampic C.

Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2019 Jul 23;8:38-46. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2019.07.001. eCollection 2019 Jun.

8.

Editorial.

Franklin S, Johnson M.

Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2019 Apr 29;7:158-159. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2019.04.001. eCollection 2018 Nov. No abstract available.

9.

Making matter matter: Meanings accorded to genetic material among Australian gay men.

Riggs DW.

Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2018 Jul 24;7:150-157. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2018.06.002. eCollection 2018 Nov.

10.

Land, women and techno-pastoral development in southern Karnataka, India.

Rudrappa S.

Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2018 Dec 28;7:141-149. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2018.12.001. eCollection 2018 Nov.

11.

Rights-holders or refugees? Do gay men need reproductive justice?

Russell C.

Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2018 Aug 16;7:131-140. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2018.07.001. eCollection 2018 Nov.

12.

Impact of government health coverage for ART: The results of a 5-year experience in Quebec.

Bissonnette F, Phillips S, Sampalis J, Dahdouh EM, St-Michel P, Buckett W, Kadoch IJ, Mahutte N.

Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2019 Mar 16;8:32-37. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2019.01.002. eCollection 2019 Jun.

13.

Procreative consciousness in a global market: gay men's paths to surrogacy in the USA.

Smietana M.

Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2019 Mar 21;7:101-111. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2019.03.001. eCollection 2018 Nov.

14.

Black celebrities, reproductive justice and queering family: an exploration.

Luna Z.

Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2019 Feb 7;7:91-100. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2018.12.002. eCollection 2018 Nov.

15.

Being questioned as parents: An interview study with Swedish commissioning parents using transnational surrogacy.

Arvidsson A, Johnsdotter S, Emmelin M, Essén B.

Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2018 Sep 20;8:23-31. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2018.08.001. eCollection 2019 Jun.

16.

Excluding indigenous bioethical concerns when regulating frozen embryo storage: An Aotearoa New Zealand case study.

Fitzgerald RP, Legge M, Rewi P, Robinson EJ.

Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2019 Feb 14;8:10-22. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2019.01.001. eCollection 2019 Jun.

17.

Honouring 'Patient 38' - a mother of all IVF mothers?

Littleton F, Bewley S.

Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2018 Nov 9;8:7-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2018.10.009. eCollection 2019 Jun.

18.

Migrant extractability: Centring the voices of egg providers in cross-border reproduction.

Nahman M.

Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2018 Nov 26;7:82-90. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2018.10.020. eCollection 2018 Nov.

19.

Effects of patient education on desire for twins and use of elective single embryo transfer procedures during ART treatment: A systematic review.

Sunderam S, Boulet SL, Jamieson DJ, Kissin DM.

Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2018 Nov 14;6:102-119. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2018.10.017. eCollection 2018 Aug. Review.

20.

Autonomy in altruistic surrogacy, conflicting kinship grammars and intentional multilineal kinship.

Gunnarsson Payne J.

Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2018 Nov 14;7:66-75. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2018.10.014. eCollection 2018 Nov.

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center