Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2018 Jul 4;31(4):527-535. doi: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01166. Epub 2018 Feb 7.

Assessment of occupational exposure to gaseous peracetic acid.

Author information

1
Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy (Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology Laboratory). stefano.dugheri@unifi.it.
2
University of Florence, Florence, Italy (Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine). alessandro.bonari@unifi.it.
3
University of Florence, Florence, Italy (Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine). ilenia.pompilio@unifi.it.
4
University of Florence, Florence, Italy (Department of Statistics, Informatics and Applications). m.colpo@disia.unifi.it.
5
University of Florence, Florence, Italy (Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine). manfredi.montalti@pecomceopistoia.it.
6
University of Florence, Florence, Italy (Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine). nicola.mucci@unifi.it.
7
University of Florence, Florence, Italy (Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine). giulio.arcangeli@unifi.it.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

In order to assess short-term exposure to peracetic acid (PAA) in disinfection processes, the Authors compared 4 industrial hygiene monitoring methods to evaluate their proficiency in measuring airborne PAA concentrations.

MATERIAL AND METHODS:

An active sampling by basic silica gel impregnated with methyl p-tolyl sulfoxide (MTSO), a passive solid phase micro-extraction technique using methyl p-tolyl sulfide (MTS) as on-fiber derivatization reagent, an electrochemical direct-reading PAA monitor, and a novel visual test strip PAA detector doped with 2,2'-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline)-6-sulfonate were evaluated and tested over the range of 0.06-16 mg/m3, using dynamically generated PAA air concentrations.

RESULTS:

The linear regression analysis of linearity and accuracy showed that the 4 methods were suitable for PAA monitoring. Peracetic acid monitoring in several use applications showed that the PAA concentration (1.8 mg/m3) was immediately dangerous to life or health as proposed by the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, and was frequently exceeded in wastewater treatment (up to 7.33 mg/m3), and sometimes during food and beverage processes and hospital high-level disinfection operations (up to 6.8 mg/m3).

CONCLUSIONS:

The methods were suitable for the quick assessment of acute exposure in PAA environmental monitoring and can assist in improving safety and air quality in the workplace where this disinfectant is used. These monitoring methods allowed the evaluation of changes to work out practices to reduce PAA vapor concentrations during the operations when workers are potentially overexposed to this strong antioxidant agent. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2018;31(4):527-535.

KEYWORDS:

air monitoring; chromatography; electrochemical sensors; peracetic acid; short-term exposure; visual test strip PAA detector

PMID:
29411781
DOI:
10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01166
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine
Loading ...
Support Center