Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Search results

Items: 6

1.

Unprotected Replication Forks Are Converted into Mitotic Sister Chromatid Bridges.

Ait Saada A, Teixeira-Silva A, Iraqui I, Costes A, Hardy J, Paoletti G, Fréon K, Lambert SAE.

Mol Cell. 2017 May 4;66(3):398-410.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.04.002.

2.

The chromatin assembly factor 1 promotes Rad51-dependent template switches at replication forks by counteracting D-loop disassembly by the RecQ-type helicase Rqh1.

Pietrobon V, Fréon K, Hardy J, Costes A, Iraqui I, Ochsenbein F, Lambert SA.

PLoS Biol. 2014 Oct 14;12(10):e1001968. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001968. eCollection 2014 Oct.

3.

Recovery of arrested replication forks by homologous recombination is error-prone.

Iraqui I, Chekkal Y, Jmari N, Pietrobon V, Fréon K, Costes A, Lambert SA.

PLoS Genet. 2012;8(10):e1002976. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002976. Epub 2012 Oct 18.

4.

Homologous recombination as a replication fork escort: fork-protection and recovery.

Costes A, Lambert SA.

Biomolecules. 2012 Dec 27;3(1):39-71. doi: 10.3390/biom3010039.

5.

The C-terminal domain of the bacterial SSB protein acts as a DNA maintenance hub at active chromosome replication forks.

Costes A, Lecointe F, McGovern S, Quevillon-Cheruel S, Polard P.

PLoS Genet. 2010 Dec 9;6(12):e1001238. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001238.

6.

Anticipating chromosomal replication fork arrest: SSB targets repair DNA helicases to active forks.

Lecointe F, Sérèna C, Velten M, Costes A, McGovern S, Meile JC, Errington J, Ehrlich SD, Noirot P, Polard P.

EMBO J. 2007 Oct 3;26(19):4239-51. Epub 2007 Sep 13.

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center