Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999 Jan;103(1 Pt 1):139-46.

Control strategies for aeroallergens in an animal facility.

Author information

Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine 04609, USA.



Prevalence of the occupational disease laboratory animal allergy could be reduced if aeroallergen reduction strategies are identified.


To reduce worker exposure to Mus m 1, an allergen from laboratory mice, the effect of filter cage tops, increased room ventilation, negatively pressurized ventilated cages, and ventilated cage-changing tables were evaluated.


Aeroallergen was collected in the ambient air and in the breathing zone and quantified by using a competitive immunoassay.


When mice were housed in unventilated cages, ambient allergen was reduced from 5.1 ng/m3 with no cage top to 1.3 ng/m3 with a simple filter-sheet top and 0.8 ng/m3 with a fitted filter-bonnet top (P <. 05). Room ventilation was increased from 6 to 10, 15, and 20 air changes per hour and had little effect on aeroallergen levels and no impact on airborne particulate matter. When mice were housed in ventilated cages, ambient allergen was significantly reduced from 1. 1 ng/m3 at positive cage pressure to 0.3 ng/m3 at negative cage pressure (P <.05). Negative cage pressure combined with handling animals under a ventilated table reduced breathing zone allergen from 28 ng/m3 with neither control strategy in place to 9 ng/m3 (P <. 05). Use of a ventilated table controlled bacterial contamination, measured as colony forming units, found in negatively pressurized cages.


Three aeroallergen control strategies are use of filter cage tops, operation of negatively pressurized cages, and use of ventilated changing tables.

[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center