Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Law Hum Behav. 1998 Dec;22(6):671-83.

Reducing the hindsight bias utilizing attorney closing arguments.

Author information

1
Center for Trial Insights, Overland Park, KS, USA.

Abstract

In the legal system, jurors are asked to render a decision after the event in question has already occurred and the final outcome, typically negative, is known. This "after-the-fact" structure of the legal system makes jurors susceptible to a human judgment phenomenon known as hindsight bias. This study focused on reducing hindsight bias in a courtroom context by incorporating a debiasing strategy within the defense's closing argument. Subjects viewed one of three videotaped versions of plaintiff and defense closing arguments in a commercial litigation case (i.e., foresight condition, hindsight condition, and hindsight debiasing condition). Results indicate that the hindsight debiasing strategy was effective in reducing subject-juror hindsight bias.

PMID:
9874927
DOI:
10.1023/a:1025706823554
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center