Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Invest Dermatol. 1998 Dec;111(6):919-24.

Comparison of genetic profiles between primary melanomas and their metastases reveals genetic alterations and clonal evolution during progression.

Author information

1
Department of Dermatology, Kanazawa University School of Medicine, Japan.

Abstract

To examine for the genetic basis of metastatic progression in cutaneous melanoma, we have compared loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of several selected chromosome regions that are implicated in the initiation and progression of melanoma, and alterations of the p16INK4a gene in 14 pairs of primary tumor and synchronous or asynchronous metastasis excised from the same patients. The most frequent genetic alteration during metastatic progression detected was the loss of p16INK4a protein expression (four of 14 cases), whereas no somatic p16INK4a gene mutations were found in any primary or metastatic tumors. LOH analyses showed that most of the chromosome losses including 6q, 8p, 9p, 9q, and 18q were shared between primary tumors and their metastases. Nevertheless, LOH of 6q and 11q and LOH of 7q not detected in primary tumors were, respectively, observed in two lymph node metastases. These results suggest that loss of p16INK4a protein expression (but not p16INK4a gene mutation) and the losses of chromosome arms 6q, 7q, and 11q play an important role in the acquisition of metastatic potential in sporadic melanoma. Furthermore, comparison of genetic profiles between the primary tumor and its metastasis revealed in several cases that heterogenous tumor cell populations might already exist at the early stage of tumorigenesis and evolve independently in the primary tumor and its metastasis, strongly suggesting that metastatic progression of sporadic melanoma is not accounted for by a linear progression model.

[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center