Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Arch Neurol. 1998 Mar;55(3):360-5.

Diagnostic validity of the dementia questionnaire for Alzheimer disease.

Author information

1
Department of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla 92093-0948, USA. roellis@ucsd.edu

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To determine the sensitivity and specificity of postmortem dementia diagnoses based on a retrospective informant interview by comparison with criterion standard neuropathological diagnoses and the results of previous clinical examinations.

SETTING:

Three university-based academic research centers.

SUBJECTS:

Fifty-four deceased elderly persons with Alzheimer disease, another dementing disorder, a neurologic disease resulting in functional impairment but no dementia, or no neurologic disorder.

METHODS:

Blinded nonclinician interviewers administered the Dementia Questionnaire (DQ) by telephone to informants, typically close relatives, who were familiar with the intellectual and functional status of the subjects before death. Two senior clinicians (LJ.T. and C.K.) rated each DQ for the presence or absence of a dementia syndrome during life and for the specific disorders causing the dementia, if present. Raters were blinded to the neuropathological findings and based their assessments only on data provided by responses to the DQ. Comparison was made with diagnoses based on neuropathological assessment. In most cases, the results of antemortem clinical examinations were also available as a check on the clinical diagnosis of the dementia syndrome. Sensitivity and specificity of the DQ diagnoses were computed, and chance-corrected agreement measures were calculated for the 2 independent DQ raters (LJ.T. and C.K.).

RESULTS:

Compared with antemortem clinical diagnosis, the average sensitivity of the DQ for the clinical syndrome of dementia was 92.8%, the specificity was 89.5%, and the interrater agreement was 98% (kappa = 0.96). Among 7 subjects with mild dementia (Mini-Mental State Examination score > or = 24 at the last clinical examination), 5 (71%) were correctly identified using the DQ. The DQ correctly indicated the absence of dementia in 8 (80%) of 10 subjects with other neurologic disorders causing functional impairment. Compared with the neuropathological diagnoses, the DQ differentiated Alzheimer disease from other primary causes of dementia with a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 72%. The interrater agreement was 93.8% (kappa = 0.85).

CONCLUSIONS:

Compared with the results of the antemortem clinical examinations, the DQ was sensitive to the presence of dementia, detected most cases of mild dementia, and discriminated dementia from other neurologic disorders causing functional impairment. Compared with the neuropathological diagnoses, the ability of the DQ to differentiate Alzheimer disease from other dementing disorders indicates that it may be useful as a research tool.

PMID:
9520010
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Silverchair Information Systems
Loading ...
Support Center