Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Med Decis Making. 1998 Jan-Mar;18(1):61-9.

What attitudes and beliefs underlie patients' decisions about participating in chemotherapy trials?

Author information

1
Division of Epidemiology and Statistics, Ontario Cancer Institute/Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Canada. hsutherl@oci.utoronto.ca

Abstract

The theory of reasoned action, which postulates that personal attitudes and external social influences predict intentions to undertake a behavior, was used as a conceptual framework for developing a questionnaire to elicit beliefs and attitudes associated with the decision to participate in a hypothetical cancer chemotherapy trial. After completing the questionnaire, two-thirds of the 150 respondents indicated they would enroll in such a trial if it were available. Considerable variation existed in both "universal" and "trial-specific" beliefs and attitudes underpinning their intentions. A substantial amount of the variance in "intention" to participate was explained by "attitude" alone (75%). Social influences, although statistically significant, made a mere 1% additional contribution. One interpretation is that subjective expected-utility theory, which essentially predicts beliefs or "attitude," is a better model. The authors conclude that both theories may be criticized regarding how well they capture the rationality and nuances of decision behavior.

PMID:
9456210
DOI:
10.1177/0272989X9801800113
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Atypon
    Loading ...
    Support Center