Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Cardiovasc Surg. 1997 Dec;5(6):648-53.

Steal syndrome complicating hemodialysis access.

Author information

1
Department of Surgery, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA.

Abstract

The purposes of this study were to examine potential causes for arterial steal syndrome in patients with hemodialysis shunts and to evaluate the results of treatment. A retrospective analysis was performed on all hemodialysis patients who presented with arterial steal syndrome over a 3-year period. Medical records were reviewed to determine demographic data, time to development of symptoms, operative details, and treatment outcome. Results of upper-extremity arteriography in the last five patients were also documented. Eighteen patients presented with steal syndrome at a mean of 7(4) months after shunt placement. Four patients had prior ipsilateral grafts. Fifteen (83%) patients had forearm shunts in loop configuration between the main brachial artery and a superficial vein, and three had straight upper-arm shunts. Graft sizes were 6 mm in five patients and 4- to 7 step grafts in 13. Graft banding was used to treat steal in 11 shunts, one of which remained patent. All five patients who underwent upper-extremity arteriography had arterial stenoses demonstrated in the inflow circulation. In conclusion, arterial steal is an uncommon complication of hemodialysis shunts. Shunt location and choice of graft do not appear to be major factors: steal can develop regardless of access site, configuration, or use of straight versus step graft. Banding is an ineffective method of treatment. Arteriography may be important to detect unsuspected inflow stenoses in patients with steal syndrome.

PMID:
9423952
DOI:
10.1016/s0967-2109(97)00072-0
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center