Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1997 Nov-Dec;21(6):857-66.

Comparison of cerebral blood volume measurements using the T1 and T2* methods in normal human brains and brain tumors.

Author information

1
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Abstract

PURPOSE:

Regional cerebral blood volume (rCBV) can be determined after bolus injection of a contrast agent by utilizing the susceptibility effect (T2* method) or the relaxation effect (T1 method). The aim of this study was to apply both methods in groups of normal subjects and tumor patients and to compare the results.

METHOD:

CBVs in different brain areas were determined from groups of 18 normal subjects and 21 patients with different histologically classified tumors. Measurements were performed using GE sequences on a 1.5 T scanner without echo planar imaging capability. As a measure of quality of a single examination, the temporal behavior of the contrast agent bolus was characterized using parameters such as rise time, peak value, fall time, and full width at half-maximum of the concentration-time curves.

RESULTS:

The quality of the T2* measurements was inferior to that obtained with the T1 method. A mean CBV value of 4.1 + 1.1 vol% averaged over the entire brain area was found in the normal collective with the T1 method. The value obtained with the T2* method was 2.6 +/- 1.1 vol%. Similar underestimations of the CBV values were also found using the T2* method when evaluating regions of interest in tumor patients.

CONCLUSION:

Both methods are able to determine rCBV in routine clinical studies. If the goal is to obtain quick, qualitative multislice information, the T2* method is adequate. For quantitative evaluations, however, the T1 method should be preferred.

PMID:
9386273
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wolters Kluwer
Loading ...
Support Center