Conditioned taste aversions and drugs of abuse: a reinterpretation

Behav Neurosci. 1997 Feb;111(1):129-36.

Abstract

A new hypothesis (and supporting data) provides a solution to the 25-year-old paradox whereby positively reinforcing drugs of abuse also support a conditioned taste aversion (CTA). The results show that unlike LiCl-induced CTAs, morphine- and cocaine-induced suppression of conditioned stimulus (CS) intake depends on the rewarding properties of the gustatory CS. This finding argues against the long-standing CTA interpretation in favor of a new reward comparison account. That is, rats decrease intake of a gustatory CS following taste-drug pairings because the value of the CS is outweighed by that of a highly reinforcing psychoactive drug. Suppression of CS intake, then, is a consequence of the well-documented positive reinforcing, rather than the hypothetical aversive, properties of drugs of abuse.

Publication types

  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Association Learning / drug effects
  • Avoidance Learning / drug effects*
  • Cocaine / pharmacology*
  • Conditioning, Classical / drug effects*
  • Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
  • Drinking / drug effects
  • Illicit Drugs / pharmacology*
  • Injections, Intraperitoneal
  • Injections, Subcutaneous
  • Lithium Chloride / pharmacology
  • Male
  • Morphine / pharmacology*
  • Motivation
  • Rats
  • Rats, Sprague-Dawley
  • Taste / drug effects*

Substances

  • Illicit Drugs
  • Morphine
  • Lithium Chloride
  • Cocaine