Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Gynecol Oncol. 1997 Apr;65(1):121-9.

Physical status and expression of HPV genes in cervical cancers.

Author information

1
Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Catholic Cancer Center, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

It is known that E2 protein of oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) inhibits the expression of E6 and E7 genes from their major promoters in vitro and suppresses the proliferation of cervical cancer cells. This suggests that the loss of functional E2 gene may provide selective advantages in the development of cervical cancer. Investigation of the relationship between the disruption of HPV-16/18 E2 genes by DNA integration and clinical outcome of cervical cancer may not only help to understand the mechanism of HPV-related cervical carcinogenesis, but may also provide novel management of cervical cancer. It was noted that integrated HPV-16/18 DNA was predominant in most patients with cervical cancers, marking 51 of a total of 68 cases (75%); episomal HPV DNAs were found in 5 cases (7.4%), and finally mixed forms of HPV DNAs with episome and integration were found in 12 cases (17.6%). Whole portions of E2 DNA of HPV-16 could be amplified by PCR in 19 (36.5%) of 52 cases of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. It was shown that there was not statistically significant association with the different stages, but integrated HPV DNAs were detectable only in the patients with far-advanced stage of cervical cancers, which also means no episomal forms were detected. Episomal forms of HPV DNA were detectable in 14 (25.9%) of 54 squamous cell carcinomas (4 pure episomal forms and 10 mixed forms), whereas only 1 (8.3%) of 12 adenocarcinomas and adenosquamous cell carcinomas contained episomal viral DNA. When HPV DNA forms were compared with initial tumor size, lymphovascular space involvement, and frequency of nodal metastasis, statistically significant relationships were not found. The association of DNA integration with invasive cervical cancers was seen regardless of HPV type; however, there were differences between the integration profiles of HPV-16 and HPV-18 DNA. Of the 51 HPV-16-containing cancers, 36 (70.6%) revealed purely integrated HPV DNA, and another 10 cases (19.6%) displayed both integrated and episomal HPV DNAs. However, 5 (9.8%) cases showed only episomal copies of the HPV-16 genome. In contrast, all 17 HPV-18-containing cancers (5 cases positive for HPV-18 and 12 cases positive for both HPV-16 and -18) revealed only the integrated form of HPV-18 DNA. The expression of E6 and E7 transcripts of HPV-16/18 is uniformly correlated with the physical status of HPV DNAs. HPV E2 mRNAs were constantly expressed in the presence of the intact virus in cases with episome and mixed forms of HPV DNA. In general, amplified signals from HPV E2 RT-PCR are more intensive than those from DNA-PCR in the same patients. It is suggested that RT-PCR is a valuable method to evaluate dynamic expression of the specific gene and seems to be more sensitive than the DNA-PCR method in detecting intact E2 gene because of the gene copy numbers.

PMID:
9103401
DOI:
10.1006/gyno.1996.4596
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center