Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Med Ethics. 1996 Aug;22(4):238-42.

Random paired scenarios--a method for investigating attitudes to prioritisation in medicine.

Author information

1
Department of Community Health and General Practice, University of Kuopio, Finland.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

This article describes a method for investigating attitudes towards prioritisation in medicine.

SETTING:

University of Kuopio, Finland.

DESIGN:

The method consisted of a set of 24 paired scenarios, which were imaginary patient cases, each containing three different ethical indicators randomly selected from a list of indicators (for example, child, rich patient, severe disease etc.). The scenarios were grouped into 12 random pairs and the procedure was repeated four times, resulting in 12 scenario pairs arranged randomly in five different sets.

SURVEY:

This method was tested with four groups of subjects (n = 8, n = 47, n = 104 and n = 36).

RESULTS:

Children and patients with a severe disease were prioritised in all groups. The aged, patients with a mild disease and patients with a self-acquired disease were negatively prioritised in all groups. Poor or rich patients were prioritised in some groups but negatively prioritised in others.

CONCLUSIONS:

The validity and reliability of this method are good and it is suitable for investigating attitudes towards medical prioritisation.

PMID:
8863150
PMCID:
PMC1377004
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Support Center