Madreporic coral for cranial base reconstruction. 8 years experience

Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1995;133(3-4):201-5. doi: 10.1007/BF01420075.

Abstract

The authors, since 1985, have used 587 Madreporic Coral grafts as bone substitute in a total of 183 patients, among them in 80 cases for repair of cranial base bone defects. They report their long-term results. Partial resorption to about 40% of the initial volume occurred in almost all cases within 8 to 10 months, with complete resorption after about one year. 20% of the coral blocks moved spontaneously or split into pieces, but could easily be withdrawn rhinoscopically through the nostrils. No CSF leakage was noticed afterwards. The local infection rate was only 4%, always close to the basal coral graft. This is lower than the infection rate after using autologous bone harvested from the inner table of the bone flap (20%). Infections were cured by removal of the coral graft. Despite the mentioned draw backs, Madreporic Coral graft implants can be recommended as bone substitute in cranial base surgery: 1. The material simplifies the surgical procedure; 2. Harvesting of autologous bone is no longer necessary; 3. Transmission of infections like AIDS, Hepatitis C or Creutzfeld-Jacob-disease can be avoided with certainty.

MeSH terms

  • Biocompatible Materials*
  • Bone Substitutes*
  • Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea / pathology
  • Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea / surgery*
  • Craniotomy / methods*
  • Ethmoid Sinus / pathology
  • Ethmoid Sinus / surgery*
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Osseointegration / physiology
  • Paranasal Sinus Neoplasms / pathology
  • Paranasal Sinus Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Postoperative Complications / pathology
  • Prostheses and Implants*
  • Wound Healing / physiology

Substances

  • Biocompatible Materials
  • Bone Substitutes