Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Chest. 1996 Aug;110(2):494-7.

Pressures required to move gas through the native airway in the presence of a fenestrated vs a nonfenestrated tracheostomy tube.

Author information

1
Division of Respiratory Therapy, Seattle VAMC, USA.

Abstract

SUBJECT:

It is occasionally desirable for patients with a tracheostomy tube to breathe through their native airway. We hypothesized that capped tracheostomy tubes with cuffs deflated would create substantial additional resistance to airflow without fenestration but would provide minimal resistance to airflow when the tube had a fenestration.

METHODS:

Two tracheal models were tested simulating a large (26 mm) and an average (18 mm) trachea. Tests were carried out with fenestrated and nonfenestrated tracheostomy tubes of sizes ranging from No. 4 to No. 10. Negative pressure inspiration was simulated using suction.

RESULTS:

With a large trachea or small tubes, the suction required to generate flows of 40 L/min or greater remained less than 5 cm H2O with or without a fenestration. However, with an average-sized trachea and no fenestration, the pressure required to generate flows of 40 L/min or greater exceeded 5 cm H2O and with No. 8 or No. 10 tubes exceeded 20 cm H2O. A fenestration routinely reduced the required pressure to less than 5 cm H2O.

CONCLUSION:

The effort required to move gas across the native airway in the absence of a fenestration may be substantial. If a patient is to breathe through a native airway, a fenestrated tube should be used unless the tracheostomy tube is a No. 4.

PMID:
8697856
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center