Felodipine as an alternative to more expensive calcium antagonists in mild to moderate hypertension

South Med J. 1996 Jun;89(6):573-7. doi: 10.1097/00007611-199606000-00004.

Abstract

We studied the therapeutic substitution of a less expensive but equally effective antihypertensive agent and assessed patient outcome. The medication of 39 patients with hypertension was changed from once-daily diltiazem hydrochloride (Cardizem CD) or nifedipine (Procardia XL) to felodipine (Plendil). Titration to a final dose was based on home and office blood pressure measurements assessed over subsequent follow-up clinic visits. Self-administered questionnaires measured different aspects of well-being and symptoms before and after the change in medication. Eighty percent of the cohort switched successfully to felodipine. Office systolic and diastolic pressures improved after the medication change (systolic: 150 mm Hg versus 144 mm Hg; diastolic: 92 mm Hg versus 87 mm Hg). No statistically significant differences were found among the 39 symptoms measured. A yearly savings potential for our institution was estimated to be $72,000.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Antihypertensive Agents / economics
  • Antihypertensive Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Blood Pressure / drug effects
  • Calcium Channel Blockers / economics
  • Calcium Channel Blockers / therapeutic use*
  • Diltiazem / therapeutic use
  • Drug Costs
  • Felodipine / economics
  • Felodipine / therapeutic use*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Hypertension / drug therapy*
  • Hypertension / physiopathology
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Nifedipine / therapeutic use
  • Prospective Studies
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Antihypertensive Agents
  • Calcium Channel Blockers
  • Diltiazem
  • Nifedipine
  • Felodipine