Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Bone Miner Res. 1995 Nov;10(11):1816-22.

Choosing between predictors of fractures.

Author information

1
Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, USA.

Abstract

The identification of those at highest risk of osteoporotic fractures is a clinical goal that requires appropriate statistical comparisons of potential predictors of fractures. This article provides a formal approach of comparing individual predictors (e.g., bone mass at one site vs bone mass at another), or sets of predictors (e.g., bone mass vs other risk factors), and contrasts newer methods, such as bootstrapping, to receiver-operating-characteristics (ROC) curves, which have been previously used. The advantages of the bootstrapping approach are illustrated using time-to-fracture data from a published study demonstrating the use of baseline bone mass measurements in the prediction of fractures in 521 subjects with variable lengths of follow-up, extending to 12.5 years. Bone mineral density (BMD) was shown to be significantly better than bone mineral content (BMD) in predicting fractures in free-living subjects, but not in retirement-community subjects. Bone mineral apparent density (BMAD) was also compared with BMC and BMD and shown not to improve fracture prediction in these subjects.

PMID:
8592960
DOI:
10.1002/jbmr.5650101126
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Wiley
    Loading ...
    Support Center