Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Mar;168(3 Pt 1):796-8.

Automated blood pressure measurements in laboring women: are they reliable?

Author information

1
Department of Anesthesiology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

In laboring women a consistent difference has become evident between measurements obtained with an automated blood pressure device and those obtained with the auscultatory method. A prospective study was designed to assess the concordance of these two methods.

STUDY DESIGN:

Three sets of brachial blood pressure measurements were made by both oscillatory and auscultatory techniques in 30 women in labor, 20 term pregnant women not in labor, and 20 nonpregnant volunteers.

RESULTS:

In the nonlaboring women and the nonpregnant controls there was satisfactory agreement between the results of the two methods of measurement. In the parturients systolic pressures were consistently and significantly higher and diastolic pressures consistently and significantly lower with the oscillatory compared with the auscultatory method, but mean arterial pressures were not different.

CONCLUSION:

In laboring women there is a discrepancy between systolic and diastolic pressures obtained by the auscultatory versus the oscillatory method of measurement, although mean pressures are not significantly different. We suggest that during labor the diagnoses of hypertension and hypotension be based on the mean rather than the systolic or diastolic pressure.

PMID:
8456882
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Loading ...
    Support Center