Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1993 Jan;81(1):38-43.

Quality filtering of the clinical literature by librarians and physicians.

Author information

1
Falk Library of the Health Sciences University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261.

Erratum in

  • Bull Med Libr Assoc 1993 Apr;81(2):233.

Abstract

A study was conducted at the University of Pittsburgh to determine the effectiveness of the selection process by clinical medical librarians and to identify the criteria used by librarians and physicians to select relevant articles. The study analyzed the similarity between librarian and physician selections, the decision-making processes used by librarians and physicians, and the utility of librarian selections versus those of physicians. No significant difference in utility between librarian and physician selection was found, suggesting that librarians can recognize and select useful articles as effectively as physicians. Both librarians and physicians based selection decisions primarily on article title, abstract, and journal title. Librarians were more likely to focus on Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) descriptors, while physicians focused on clinical applicability or similarity to a specific case. Journal selection data indicate that the principle internal medicine journals were the most frequently selected sources. The study demonstrates that librarians can effectively serve a quality filtering function in the clinical environment, and they should consider extending quality filtering activities to other arenas.

PMID:
8428187
PMCID:
PMC225726
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center