Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Brain Inj. 1993 Jul-Aug;7(4):309-17.

Glasgow Outcome Scale: an inter-rater reliability study.

Author information

1
Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Scotland.

Abstract

This study was set up to test the reliability of the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) when information was obtained from different sources. Eighty assessments were carried out on a group of 58 patients at three different time intervals up to 24 months post-injury. Each assessment consisted of three independently obtained GOS scores for each patient; (i) a score by a research psychologist after interview and neuropsychological testing of the patient; (ii) a score, obtained by post, by the patient's general practitioner (GP), and (iii) a score made by a research worker based on questionnaire information obtained from relatives by post. The agreement between the psychologist's score and that based on the relatives' information was high (r = 0.79 p = 0.001) whereas the correlation between the psychologist's score and that of the GP was low (r = 0.49 p = 0.001). The GPs tended to make overoptimistic assessments and this was most notable at 6 months post-injury when only 50% of the GPs' assessments agreed with those of the psychologist. We have shown that reliability of the GOS varies with the method of obtaining data. Ideally patients should be interviewed and tested by staff who have not been involved in the acute care of the patient. Failing this, information should be obtained from relatives of the patient and used by staff, trained in the use of the GOS, to assign a GOS score.

PMID:
8358404
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Loading ...
    Support Center