Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Proteins. 1993 Sep;17(1):49-61.

Performance evaluation of amino acid substitution matrices.

Author information

1
Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98104.

Abstract

Several choices of amino acid substitution matrices are currently available for searching and alignment applications. These choices were evaluated using the BLAST searching program, which is extremely sensitive to differences among matrices, and the Prosite catalog, which lists members of hundreds of protein families. Matrices derived directly from either sequence-based or structure-based alignments of distantly related proteins performed much better overall than extrapolated matrices based on the Dayhoff evolutionary model. Similar results were obtained with the FASTA searching program. Improved performance appears to be general rather than family-specific, reflecting improved accuracy in scoring alignments. An implementation of a multiple matrix strategy was also tested. While no combination of three matrices performed as well as the single best matrix, BLOSUM 62, good results were obtained using a combination of sequence-based and structure-based matrices. This hybrid set of matrices is likely to be useful in certain situations. Our results illustrate the importance of matrix selection and the value of a comprehensive approach to evaluation of protein comparison tools.

PMID:
8234244
DOI:
10.1002/prot.340170108
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Wiley
    Loading ...
    Support Center