Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Int J Epidemiol. 1993 Dec;22(6):1070-6.

Issues of rescue and medical care following the 1988 Armenian earthquake.

Author information

1
Disaster Assessment and Epidemiology Section, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30341-3724.

Abstract

On-site emergency care and rescue efforts may be critical in preventing disability and other serious consequences of disasters. In this report we compare efforts used in the rescue and emergency medical care of 189 people (case subjects) from Kumairy (Leninakan), Armenia, who were hospitalized with serious injuries following the Armenian earthquake of 7 December 1988, with efforts used in helping 68 people (controls) from Kumairy with mild injuries who were not hospitalized. We used a standardized interview questionnaire to ascertain the circumstances of entrapment, the rescue process used, the injuries the victims sustained, and the medical care they received. Case and control subjects shared similar social and demographic characteristics; however, case subjects waited longer to be rescued and to receive medical care than did control subjects. Of the people who said they were trapped, 66.2% of the case subjects and 41.2% of the control subjects said that they were trapped for > 1 hour (odds ratio [OR] = 2.79, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.52-5.13) whilst the OR for > 6 hours of entrapment was 3.88 (95% CI: 1.69-9.10). Of those requiring medical care, 28.6% of people who were hospitalized waited > 1 hour after rescue to receive medical care, compared with only 14.7% of the control subjects (OR = 2.32, 95% CI: 1.05-5.23). In addition to the case-control study, we collected data on general characteristics of the rescue and emergency medical care process. We found that most of the trapped people were rescued by untrained local inhabitants who most often used their hands or simple tools.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS).

PMID:
8144288
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center