Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Nurse Midwifery. 1994 Mar-Apr;39(2):98-106.

The myth of vicarious liability. Impact on barriers to nurse-midwifery practice.

Author information

1
American College of Nurse-Midwives, Washington, DC 20006.

Abstract

Lack of understanding of the legal concept of vicarious liability may underlie certain barriers to nurse-midwifery practice. Malpractice insurance surcharges, denial or restrictive limitation of clinical privileges, and physician "supervision" requirements may all be premised, at least in part, upon an assumption that physicians who work with, and hospitals that grant clinical privileges to, nurse-midwives will automatically be liable for any negligent actions or omissions of CNMs. This article examines the basis for such assumptions and, based upon research into the current case law on this subject, concludes that popular assumptions regarding physician/CNM or hospital/CNM vicarious liability are unfounded. According to the author's research, no reported cases exist to support that assumption. Vicarious liability arises from the relationship between two parties and is imposed solely on the basis of the relationship. An employer is almost always vicariously liable for the negligent actions or omissions of his employee. If a nurse-midwife is the bona fide employee of a hospital or physician, the latter will most likely be subject to vicarious liability. Absent of any employment relationship, however, such liability will not necessarily be imposed. Rather, the result will vary depending upon the facts of each case, and each professional's relative degree of fault would be determined upon the basis of his or her own actions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS).

PMID:
8027852
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center