Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Ann Intern Med. 1994 Aug 1;121(3):200-6.

The use of predicted confidence intervals when planning experiments and the misuse of power when interpreting results.

Author information

1
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

Erratum in

  • Ann Intern Med 1995 Mar 15;122(6):478.

Abstract

Although there is a growing understanding of the importance of statistical power considerations when designing studies and of the value of confidence intervals when interpreting data, confusion exists about the reverse arrangement: the role of confidence intervals in study design and of power in interpretation. Confidence intervals should play an important role when setting sample size, and power should play no role once the data have been collected, but exactly the opposite procedure is widely practiced. In this commentary, we present the reasons why the calculation of power after a study is over is inappropriate and how confidence intervals can be used during both study design and study interpretation.

PMID:
8017747
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Silverchair Information Systems
    Loading ...
    Support Center