Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994 May;66(5):819-29.

Conflict between intuitive and rational processing: when people behave against their better judgment.

Author information

1
Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst 01003-7710.

Abstract

When offered an opportunity to win $1 on every "win" trial in which they drew a red jelly bean, subjects frequently elected to draw from a bowl that contained a greater absolute number, but a smaller proportion, of red beans (e.g., 7 in 100) than from a bowl with fewer red beans but better odds (e.g., 1 in 10). Subjects reported that although they knew the probabilities were against them, they felt they had a better chance when there were more red beans. Similar, but less extreme results were obtained on "lose" trials, where drawing a red bean meant losing $1. These results were predicted from the concretive and experiential principles of cognitive-experiential self-theory. Nonoptimal choices in the laboratory were significantly correlated with heuristic responses to relevant vignettes and with self-reported gambling in real life.

PMID:
8014830
DOI:
10.1037//0022-3514.66.5.819
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for American Psychological Association
Loading ...
Support Center