Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Cytopathology. 1994 Aug;5(4):219-25.

Which cervical sampler? A comparison of four methods.

Author information

1
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leeds General Infirmary, UK.

Abstract

Four cytology sampling methods were compared in 1063 patients referred for colposcopy with a recent abnormal smear. A dyskaryotic smear of any grade was considered a positive result, though comparisons were limited to cases with a subsequent biopsy confirming CINII or III. There were no differences between the abilities of any of the four methods to detect higher grades of CIN (chi (2)3 = 4.603, P > 0.20). The presence or absence of endocervical cells in a smear was not significantly associated with any variation in success rate (chi (2)1 = 0.959, P > 0.30). The joint analysis of the four methods and the presence/absence of endocervical cells also showed no significant effects (chi (2)7 = 12.768, 0.1 > P > 0.05). In the latter analysis the trend towards a conventional level of significance was accounted for by the Aylesbury spatula giving a relatively high success rate when endocervical cells were present. The suggestion of advantage for the Aylesbury spatula merits further investigation.

[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wiley
Loading ...
Support Center