Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Stat Med. 1995 Feb 28;14(4):395-411.

A random-effects regression model for meta-analysis.

Author information

1
Technology Assessment Group, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

Abstract

Many meta-analyses use a random-effects model to account for heterogeneity among study results, beyond the variation associated with fixed effects. A random-effects regression approach for the synthesis of 2 x 2 tables allows the inclusion of covariates that may explain heterogeneity. A simulation study found that the random-effects regression method performs well in the context of a meta-analysis of the efficacy of a vaccine for the prevention of tuberculosis, where certain factors are thought to modify vaccine efficacy. A smoothed estimator of the within-study variances produced less bias in the estimated regression coefficients. The method provided very good power for detecting a non-zero intercept term (representing overall treatment efficacy) but low power for detecting a weak covariate in a meta-analysis of 10 studies. We illustrate the model by exploring the relationship between vaccine efficacy and one factor thought to modify efficacy. The model also applies to the meta-analysis of continuous outcomes when covariates are present.

PMID:
7746979
DOI:
10.1002/sim.4780140406
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center