Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Biochemistry. 1994 Nov 22;33(46):13918-27.

Histidine-rich glycoprotein and platelet factor 4 mask heparan sulfate proteoglycans recognized by acidic and basic fibroblast growth factor.

Author information

1
Division of Cell Biology, John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra.

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) need to interact with cell-surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) in order to bind to and activate FGF receptors. In this paper, three major heparin-binding proteins, histidine-rich glycoprotein (HRG) and antithrombin III (ATIII), which are constitutively present at high concentrations in plasma, and platelet factor 4 (PF4), which is released locally at high concentrations by degranulating platelets, were tested for their ability to act as modulators of FGF activity by competing with the FGFs for cell-surface HSPGs. HRGs from both chicken and human, and human PF4, were demonstrated to compete with each other and with acidic FGF (aFGF) and basic FGF (bFGF) for binding to BALB/c 3T3 cell-surface HSPGs, whereas ATIII did not compete. Thus, HRG, PF4, aFGF, and bFGF all interact with the same HS chains on the 3T3 cell surface, either binding to the same or binding to adjacent saccharide sequences on the chains. In terms of their relative binding affinity for cell-surface HSPGs, the hierarchy was shown to be PF4 > or = bFGF > aFGF = cHRG > hHRG. HRG was also shown to significantly inhibit both FGF-stimulated and endogenous 3T3 cell DNA synthesis. HRG also binds to extracellular matrices (ECM), originating from bovine corneal endothelial cells, in a heparin-inhibitable manner. Indeed, both HRG and PF4, at physiological concentrations, were shown to effectively inhibit the binding of 125I-aFGF and 125I-bFGF to ECM. In addition, HRG was able to displace biologically active bFGF from the ECM. On the basis of these findings, it is proposed that HRG and PF4 may act as positive regulators of FGF activity by displacing FGF from the ECM or basement membrane and making FGF available to responsive cells. Alternatively, they could act as negative regulators by masking HSPGs on responsive cells and preventing FGF receptor activation.

PMID:
7524669
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments

    Supplemental Content

    Loading ...
    Support Center