Angiography and peritoneal lavage in blunt abdominal trauma

J Trauma. 1981 Oct;21(10):848-53. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198110000-00004.

Abstract

Records of 123 consecutive patients who underwent abdominal angiography for blunt trauma were reviewed. Twenty-four patients underwent abdominal angiography on the basis of positive physical findings. Seven (29%) required intervention as determined by angiography and the diagnosis was confirmed. Ninety-nine patients had abdominal angiography in association with angiographic evaluation of the chest, pelvis, or extremities. In 14 (14%) the angiogram indicated the need for intervention. In 13 this diagnosis was confirmed at laparotomy. The fourteenth patient was embolized angiographically and did well. Fifty-four patients had peritoneal lavage in addition to their angiograms. Sixteen were positive and 38 were negative. In four patients the lavage was negative and the angiographic findings indicated need for intervention. Three of these four were confirmed at laparotomy and the fourth patient was embolized angiographically. Indications for abdominal angiography in blunt trauma are: 1) incidental to needed thoracic aortography; 2) incidental to angiography when done for pelvic fractures; 3) suspected intra-abdominal injuries when clinical and lavage data are not definitive.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Abdominal Injuries / diagnosis*
  • Abdominal Injuries / diagnostic imaging
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Angiography
  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Peritoneal Cavity
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Therapeutic Irrigation
  • Wounds, Nonpenetrating / diagnosis*
  • Wounds, Nonpenetrating / diagnostic imaging