Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Circulation. 1983 Feb;67(2):348-52.

Anatomic validation of left ventricular mass estimates from clinical two-dimensional echocardiography: initial results.


We performed a prospective anatomic validation study to determine the accuracy of left ventricular (LV) mass estimates from clinical two-dimensional echocardiographic (2-D echo) studies. In 21 subjects, antemortem 2-D echo LV mass determinations were compared with anatomic LV weight by postmortem chamber dissection. Major cardiac diagnoses included anatomic LV aneurysm in four, status post aneurysmectomy in one, transmural myocardial infarction in seven, congestive cardiomyopathy in five, rheumatic mitral disease in two, chronic severe mitral or aortic regurgitation in three, amyloid heart in two, and normal heart in three. Marked right-heart dilatation was present in 11 patients and LV thrombus in four. Regression equations derived in vitro for each 2-D echo instrument were used to correct LV mass estimates based on a short-axis, area-length method: uncorrected LV mass = 1.055 x k x 5/6 (AtLt - AcLc) + b, where At = total short-axis LV image area at the high papillary muscle level, Lc = endocardial LV length, k = an instrument-specific regression slope and b = an instrument-specific intercept. LV mass by 2-D echo correlated extremely well with actual LV weight (r = 0.93 slope = 0.85, SEE = 31 g, range 77-454 g). In contrast, M-mode echocardiographic LV mass estimates were less reliable (r = 0.86, SEE = 59 g) in these markedly distorted hearts. These 2-D echo LV mass results compare favorably with reported results from biplane angiography and M-mode echocardiography in more symmetric hearts. Thus, regression-corrected 2-D echo may be the method of choice for determining LV mass in man.

[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for HighWire
    Loading ...
    Support Center