Biological factors and crime: implications for forensic psychiatry

Int J Law Psychiatry. 1983;6(1):1-15. doi: 10.1016/0160-2527(83)90003-1.

Abstract

To summarize, we can say that (1) Criminal behavior, especially chronic criminal behavior, seems to be partly genetically predisposed; (2) An important task at this point is to attempt to determine the biological factors which predispose people to crime; and (3) We have related some tentative initial steps being taken in the study of the autonomic nervous system as one possible heritable, biological basis for the failure of normal social learning forces in inhibiting criminal behavior. Early in this paper we discussed the tenability of asserting criminal responsibility on individuals whose criminal behavior has a partly genetic etiology. But this special consideration seems to set biological factors apart as being in some unique causal category. In fact, genetic, physiological, and biochemical factors are causal agents in the same sense as family, social class, or neighborhood factors. Of course, criminal behavior (like all other behavior) must be caused; one class of causal variables is the biological category. The legal doctrine of responsibility is not challenged by identifying biological factors as partially determining crime any more than it is by findings of social causation. Only in cases in which abnormal biological factors are exceptionally powerful influences might responsibility be challenged. Such cases will be quite rare.

Publication types

  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Adoption
  • Aggression / psychology
  • Antisocial Personality Disorder / genetics*
  • Antisocial Personality Disorder / prevention & control
  • Antisocial Personality Disorder / psychology
  • Crime*
  • Diseases in Twins
  • Female
  • Forensic Psychiatry*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Risk
  • Social Environment
  • Violence
  • XYY Karyotype / genetics