Intravenous versus intracoronary streptokinase therapy for acute myocardial infarction in community hospitals

Am J Cardiol. 1984 Aug 1;54(3):256-60. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(84)90177-2.

Abstract

A consecutive series of 184 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) received thrombolytic therapy. The first 63 were treated in the catheterization laboratory with intracoronary streptokinase (IC-STK), and 44 (70%) had successful thrombolysis. One hundred twenty-one patients received intravenous (IV) STK immediately after diagnosis of AMI, and 99 (82%) were found to have an open infarct artery. Only 58% of patients (14 of 24) who required transfer from out-of-town hospitals for IC-STK treatment had successful thrombolysis; in contrast, IV-STK given in the local hospital resulted in an 85% (72 of 85) rate of thrombolysis (p = 0.005). IV-STK thus appears at least as effective as IC-STK for AMI and is more effective for patients treated in hospitals without catheterization facilities.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Cardiac Catheterization
  • Coronary Vessels
  • Female
  • Hospitals, Community
  • Humans
  • Infusions, Parenteral
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Myocardial Infarction / drug therapy*
  • Myocardial Infarction / physiopathology
  • Streptokinase / administration & dosage*
  • Streptokinase / adverse effects
  • Streptokinase / therapeutic use
  • Stroke Volume / drug effects
  • Time Factors

Substances

  • Streptokinase