ULTRA-WIDEFIELD IMAGING DETECTION RATE IN IDENTIFYING PERIPHERAL RETINAL TEARS IN SINGLE VERSUS MONTAGE OF PERIPHERAL STEERING

Retina. 2024 Mar 1;44(3):406-413. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000003979.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the detection rate of orthogonal, directed peripheral steering, and automontaged images with ultra-widefield imaging and the factors influencing the ability to identify retinal breaks.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Methods: Three hundred and seventy-six treatment-naive eyes (349 patients) that underwent laser retinopexy for retinal breaks between 2015 and 2021 were included. Pretreatment ultra-widefield orthogonal, peripheral steering, and automontage were cross-referenced to scleral-depressed examination to determine whether images successfully visualized all retinal breaks. Total relative retinal area (RRA) visualized was divided by its optic disk area (pixels) to calculate relative retinal area. Potential associations were assessed by linear regression analysis.

Results: One hundred and sixty two eyes (154 patients) met inclusion criteria. Orthogonal, peripheral steering, and automontage images showed detection rates of 47.5%, 90.7%, and 80.0%, respectively. Relative retinal area increased from orthogonal versus montage by 34.7% ± 26.5% (mean ± SD), which increased the detection rate by 90.8% ( P = 0.006). In linear probability models, vertical meridian tears decreased probability of identification in orthogonal, peripheral steering, and automontage by -26.6%, -86.2%, and -68.7%, respectively ( P < 0.001), and horizontal meridian tears increased the probability by 62.2%, 92.9%, and 85.5%, respectively, ( P < 0.001). Tears posterior to the equator in orthogonal images increased the probability (91.4%, P < 0.001). Artifacts such as lids/lashes, reflection, and face guard decreased the probability in directed peripheral steering by -28.6%, -50.0%, and -66.7%, respectively, ( P = 0.020, P = 0.049, and P = 0.016).

Conclusion: Using directed peripheral steering and automontage increases RRA and detection rate of identifying peripheral retinal breaks. Tears in horizontal meridians or posterior to the equator increase the probability of identification. Common ultra-widefield imaging artifacts can significantly limit the probability of identifying retinal tears.

MeSH terms

  • Diagnostic Imaging
  • Fluorescein Angiography / methods
  • Humans
  • Retina
  • Retinal Perforations* / diagnosis
  • Retinal Perforations* / surgery
  • Retrospective Studies