Well-controlled disease activity with drug treatment will not improve the frailty status of RA patients to robust state: A multicenter observational study (T-FLAG)

Objectives: To investigate a plateau in treatment enhancement for improving the frailty status of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.

Methods: A total of 345 RA patients who were not robust in 2021 were assigned to the improved ("robust 2022," n = 51) and non-improved ("pre-frailty/frailty 2022," n = 294) groups. Factors associated with "robust 2022" were examined by logistic regression analysis. Patients were assigned to the stable (Follow-up mean DAS28-ESR in 2020 and 2021 < 3.2, n = 225) and unstable (≥3.2, n = 120) groups, which were further divided into the non-improved (stable: n = 180, unstable: n = 114) and improved (stable: n = 45, unstable: n = 6) groups. Factors influencing Japanese Cardiovascular Health Study (J-CHS) score were examined by multiple regression analysis. Changes over 2 years were compared between the non-improved and improved groups of the stable group.

Results: The associated factor of "robust 2022" was the follow-up meanDAS28-ESR in 2020 and 2021 < 3.2 (i.e., stable state) (OR: 4.01). Follow-up mean DAS28-ESR in 2020 and 2021 was associated with J-CHS score (T = 2.536, p = .013) only in the unstable group. In the stable group, HAQ-DI was lower (2020: 0.32 vs. 0.16; 2021: 0.32 vs. 0.17; 2022: 0.32 vs. 0.21), and the proportion of J-CHS: Q4 (weakness) was lower (2020: 48.4 vs. 17.8%; 2021: 55.0 vs. 29.2%; 2022: 50.4 vs. 0%), in the improved group than in the non-improved group, whereas both groups maintained clinical and functional remission over 2 years.

Conclusions: Drug treatment to maintain well-controlled disease activity alone is insufficient for improving patients' frailty status after achieving treat-to-target goals, suggesting the need for multifaceted approaches.