Objective: To assess the value of preliminary testicular core extraction (TCE) as a tool for determining whether to pursue clinic testicular extraction (cTESE) versus microscopic testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) to minimize both financial burden and procedural complexity.
Methods: All men with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) from 2018 to 2022 who underwent clinic TCE were analyzed. Patients who were found to have sperm on initial TCE were recommended cTESE. Patients who did not have sperm on initial TCE were recommended for mTESE. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of TCE were calculated. Cost reductions were determined based on this institution's fees. A nonparametric Wilcoxon test was performed to determine statistical significance between the results of the TCE sperm present and sperm absent groups.
Results: Of the 82 NOA patients undergoing TCE, 51 (62.2%) core biopsies were positive for sperm and 31 (37.8%) were negative for sperm. The SRR for 35 men who then underwent cTESE following sperm seen on TCE was 97.1%. The SRR for 8 men who underwent mTESE after no sperm was found on TCE was 75%. The positive predictive value of TCE for successful TESE result is 94.4% for men with NOA. Treatment success rate of TCE and cTESE was 79.1% with a cost reduction of 59.4%.
Conclusion: TCE is a prognostic tool to guide decision making between cTESE and mTESE and maximize sperm retrieval rate while mitigating financial burden and operative complexity. TCE is important to identify ideal candidates for both procedures to maximize efficacy and safety amongst men with NOA.
Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.