Antithrombotic Therapy After Acute Coronary Syndromes or Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in East Asian Populations

JACC Asia. 2022 Feb 15;2(1):1-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2021.12.005. eCollection 2022 Feb.

Abstract

Because guidelines and recommendations in response to multiple randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of new therapies undergo rapid changes, antithrombotic therapies for patients after acute coronary syndrome, or percutaneous coronary intervention, are becoming more complex in daily clinical practice. The proportion of Asian populations enrolled in landmark RCTs is substantially low, which limits the direct application of trial findings into clinical practice in Asian countries. Moreover, compared with Caucasian patients, East Asian patients are considered to have a different ischemia/bleeding propensity in response to antithrombotic therapy, known as the "East Asian paradox" (ie, more bleeding events but fewer thromboembolic events). Coincident with consecutive RCTs in Western populations to optimize antithrombotic strategies, several such studies have now been conducted in East Asian cohorts. Herein, we provide a comprehensive summary of the key RCTs in this regard and propose future directions and perspectives for optimal antithrombotic therapies in East Asian patients.

Keywords: ACS, acute coronary syndrome; BARC, Bleeding Academic Research Consortium; CAD, coronary artery disease; CHIP, complex higher-risk and indicated procedure/patients; DAPT, dual antiplatelet therapy; DES, drug-eluting stent; DOAC, direct oral anticoagulant; HBR, high bleeding risk; MI, myocardial infarction; OAC, oral anticoagulation; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; PRU, P2Y12 reaction unit; RCT, randomized controlled trial; acute coronary syndrome; antiplatelets; antithrombotic therapy; percutaneous coronary intervention.

Publication types

  • Review