Application and Match Rates in the Complex General Surgical Oncology Match

Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Dec;29(13):8094-8098. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-12428-w. Epub 2022 Aug 23.

Abstract

Background: The Society of Surgical Oncology collaborates with the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) to facilitate the Complex General Surgical Oncology (CGSO) Match.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to understand trends in CGSO Match outcomes. We hypothesized that (1) match rates would increase with time; (2) US allopathic graduates would have higher match rates than non-US allopathic graduates; and (3) most applicants would match at one of their top three ranked choices.

Methods: The NRMP provided applicant and program data from the CGSO Match (2014-2021). Chi-square tests elucidated temporal trends and match rates by applicant archetype.

Results: The annual number of applicants decreased from 103 to 90 (13% decrease), while the annual number of fellowship positions increased from 56 to 67 (20% increase) from 2014-2021. The annual percentage of applicants who did not match decreased from 46% to 26% (p < 0.05). Annual match rates increased from 54% to 74% (p < 0.05). US allopathic graduates had higher match rates than non-US allopathic graduates but this disparity narrowed over time (84% vs. 55% in 2021; p < 0.001). Approximately half of all applicants matched at one of their top three choices (first, 29%; second, 12%; third, 8%). Applicants matching at one of their top three choices increased from 36% to 50% (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: CGSO Match rates have increased over the past decade, thus primarily benefiting non-US allopathic graduates. Most applicants match at one of their top three choices. More research is needed to understand disparities in match rates by applicant and residency program characteristics.

MeSH terms

  • Fellowships and Scholarships
  • Humans
  • Internship and Residency*
  • Surgical Oncology*
  • United States