Immunogenicity and risk of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection after Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination in patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Eur J Cancer. 2022 Jan:160:243-260. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.10.014. Epub 2021 Oct 26.

Abstract

Background: Patients with cancer are considered a priority group for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination given their high risk of contracting severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, limited data exist regarding the efficacy of immunisation in this population. In this study, we assess the immunologic response after COVID-19 vaccination of cancer versus non-cancer population.

Methods: PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science databases were searched from 01st March 2020 through 12th August 12 2021. Primary end-points were anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (S) immunoglobulin G (IgG) seroconversion rates, T-cell response, and documented SARS-CoV-2 infection after COVID-19 immunisation. Data were extracted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Overall effects were pooled using random-effects models.

Results: This systematic review and meta-analysis included 35 original studies. Overall, 51% (95% confidence interval [CI], 41-62) and 73% (95% CI, 64-81) of patients with cancer developed anti-S IgG above the threshold level after partial and complete immunisation, respectively. Patients with haematologic malignancies had a significantly lower seroconversion rate than those with solid tumours after complete immunisation (65% vs 94%; P < 0.0001). Compared with non-cancer controls, oncological patients were less likely to attain seroconversion after incomplete (risk ratio [RR] 0.45 [95% CI 0.35-0.58]) and complete (RR 0.69 [95% CI 0.56-0.84]) COVID-19 immunisation schemes. Patients with cancer had a higher likelihood of having a documented SARS-CoV-2 infection after partial (RR 3.21; 95% CI 0.35-29.04) and complete (RR 2.04; 95% CI 0.38-11.10) immunisation.

Conclusions: Patients with cancer have an impaired immune response to COVID-19 vaccination compared with controls. Strategies that endorse the completion of vaccination schemes are warranted. Future studies should aim to evaluate different approaches that enhance oncological patients' immune response.

Keywords: COVID-19 breakthrough infections; COVID-19 vaccines; Haematologic neoplasms; Immunogenicity; Neoplasms; SARS-CoV-2; Vaccines.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Antibodies, Viral / blood
  • Antibodies, Viral / immunology*
  • COVID-19 / virology
  • COVID-19 Drug Treatment*
  • COVID-19 Vaccines / adverse effects*
  • Humans
  • Immunoglobulin G / blood
  • Immunoglobulin G / immunology
  • Neoplasms / chemically induced
  • Neoplasms / drug therapy
  • Neoplasms / immunology*
  • Neoplasms / virology
  • SARS-CoV-2 / drug effects*
  • SARS-CoV-2 / immunology
  • Seroconversion
  • Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus / immunology
  • T-Lymphocytes / immunology*
  • Vaccination / adverse effects*

Substances

  • Antibodies, Viral
  • COVID-19 Vaccines
  • Immunoglobulin G
  • Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus
  • spike protein, SARS-CoV-2