Aims: Fundic gland polyps (FGPs) arise sporadically and in combination with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Criteria for distinguishing low-grade dysplasia (LGD) from regenerative atypia in FGPs are not well established. The aims of study were to determine: (i) interobserver variability in diagnosing LGD in FGPs; (ii) bias in diagnosing LGD in FAP patients; and (iii) stringent criteria for LGD in FGPs.
Methods and results: Five senior pathologists who were blinded to the clinical history reviewed 72 FAP-associated FGPs and 34 sporadic FGPs. Cases were classified as negative (score = 0) or positive (score = 1) for LGD. Each case was assigned a 'combined dysplasia score' (CDS) ranging from 0 to 5 to reflect all five opinions. Fleiss' kappa showed only moderate interobserver agreement (κ = 0.46). Forty-one FGPs were classified as negative for dysplasia by consensus (CDS = 0-1), including 10 (24%) originally diagnosed as LGD. In contrast, all 37 cases classified as LGD by consensus (CDS = 4-5) were originally diagnosed as LGD, indicating that overdiagnosis of dysplasia is more common than underdiagnosis (P = 0.0012). Cytological atypia in the surface epithelium and an abrupt transition between atypical and normal-appearing epithelium were the most sensitive (97% and 100%, respectively) and specific (100% and 98%, respectively) features of dysplasia (P < 0.0001 for both comparisons). Very good agreement was achieved when a diagnosis of dysplasia was based on the presence of both features (κ = 0.85).
Conclusions: There is high interobserver variability and a tendency to overdiagnose LGD in FGPs. Strict criteria requiring both surface atypia and abrupt transition for LGD in FGPs result in low interobserver variability.
Keywords: familial adenomatous polyposis; foveolar dysplasia; fundic gland polyp; low-grade dysplasia; stomach.
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.