Broad-range fungal PCR is a powerful tool for identifying pathogens directly from patient specimens; however, reported estimates of clinical utility vary and costs discourage universal testing. We investigated the diagnostic and clinical utility of broad-range fungal PCR by examining 9 years of results from sinonasal specimens, hypothesizing that this anatomic location would identify immunocompromised patients at high risk for invasive fungal disease. We retrospectively identified 644 PCRs and 1,446 fungal cultures from sinus sites. To determine the relative performance of each testing modality, we performed chart review on 52 patients having specimens submitted for culture and PCR on the same day. Positivity rates were significantly higher for PCR (37.1%) than culture (13.7%) but similar for formalin-fixed and fresh tissues (42.3% versus 34.6%). Relative to culture, PCR had significantly faster turnaround time to both preliminary (94.5 versus 108.8 h) and final positive (137.9 versus 278.5 h) results. Among chart-reviewed patients, 88% were immunocompromised, 65% had proven or probable fungal disease, and testing sensitivities for culture and PCR (67.5% and 85.0%) were not statistically different. Nevertheless, PCR identified pathogens not recovered by culture in 14.9% of cases and informed clinical decision-making in 16.7% of all reviewed cases, and sensitivity of PCR combined with culture (90.0%) was higher than that of culture alone. We conclude that broad-range fungal PCR is frequently informative for patients at risk of serious fungal disease and is complementary to and has faster turnaround time than culture. Formalin-fixed tissue does not adversely affect diagnostic yield, but anatomic site may impact assay positivity rates.
Keywords: clinical yield; frozen section; fungal PCR; fungal stain; invasive fungal disease; invasive fungal infection; molecular microbiology; sinusitis.