Comparison of tumescent local anesthesia vs normal anesthesia technology in upper blepharoplasty in Asian women

Background: Blepharoplasty is the most common type of plastic surgery, used to improve most of the eyelid skin sag caused by aging. In the past, local infiltration anesthesia was widely used in blepharoplasty. Tumescent local analgesia (TLA) is safe and reliable method for anesthesia, even children can use this method.

Aims: This research aimed to systematically compare the differences between conventional local infiltration anesthesia and TLA in blepharoplasty.

Patients/methods: One hundred and seventy-eight bilateral upper blepharoplasty patients participated in this research. Visual analog scale (VAS) was employed to evaluate the postoperative pain in the patients. Periorbital appearances are based on light photography and judged by both medical and nonmedical panel.

Results: The use of TLA decreased the surgery duration but had no influence on the other surgery characteristics of upper blepharoplasty. Using TLA for anesthesia in bilateral upper blepharoplasty generated less pain than using local infiltration anesthesia. At day 7 after upper blepharoplasty, the rate of generation of both ecchymosis and erythema in normal anesthesia (NA) side were higher than in TLA side. The satisfaction of patients after upper blepharoplasty was not influenced by the use of different anesthesia methods.

Conclusion: Compared with the normal anesthesia technology, the use of TLA in the upper blepharoplasty shortened the surgery duration, alleviated the postoperative pain, and mitigated the generation of ecchymosis and erythema. So, TLA is suitable for the performance of anesthesia in blepharoplasty.