Send to

Choose Destination
Br J Nutr. 1988 May;59(3):373-80.

Modifications of gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) secretion in man by a high-fat diet.

Author information

Department of Biochemistry, University of Surrey, Guildford.


1. Five healthy volunteers (usual fat intake 103 (SE 9) g/d and energy intake 9855 (SE 937) kJ/d were given on two separate occasions (a) 100 g oral glucose and (b) sufficient intravenous (IV) glucose to obtain similar arterialized plasma glucose levels to those after oral glucose. 2. Subjects increased their fat intake by 68 (SE 9.6)% for 28 d by supplementing their diet with 146 ml double cream/d (fat intake on high-fat diet (HFD) 170 (SE 8) g/d; energy intake 12347 (SE 770)). 3. The 100 g oral glucose load was repeated and IV glucose again given in quantities sufficient to obtain similar arterialized blood glucose levels. Immunoreactive plasma insulin, C-peptide and gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) were measured. 4. Plasma GIP levels were higher following oral glucose after the HFD (area under plasma GIP curve 0-180 min 1660 (SE 592) v. 2642 (SE 750) ng/l.h for control and HFD respectively; P less than 0.05). Both insulin and C-peptide levels were significantly higher after oral than after IV glucose (P less than 0.01) but neither were affected by the HFD. Glucose levels were lower following the HFD after both oral and IV glucose (area under plasma glucose curve 0-180 min, following oral glucose 6.7 (SE 0.3) mmol/l.h for control and 4.2 (SE 0.6) mmol/l.h for HFD; P less than 0.01). 5. Glucose-stimulated GIP secretion was thus enhanced by the HFD. Insulin secretion in response to oral glucose was unchanged, in spite of an improvement in glucose tolerance. 6. The improvement in glucose tolerance post-HFD could possibly be due to a GIP-mediated inhibition of hepatic glycogenolysis, or a decreased rate of glucose uptake from the small intestine.

[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Cambridge University Press
Loading ...
Support Center