Epidemiological Patterns and Treatment Outcomes in a Private Practice Community Voice Clinic

J Voice. 2022 May;36(3):437.e11-437.e20. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.06.025. Epub 2020 Jul 28.

Abstract

Objectives: Voice therapy is administered by speech-language pathologists in multiple practice settings, including private practice community voice clinics. However, the evidence for diagnosis patterns and voice treatment outcomes in community voice clinics is very limited. The purpose of this study was to extend knowledge from a previous investigation by assessing the epidemiological patterns of patient referrals to a private practice community voice clinic across a 4-year period (50 months) and to measure the effectiveness of treatment outcomes for patients who were followed up with voice therapy in the same setting.

Study design: Retrospective case series.

Methods: Consecutive patient records from November 2014 through January 2019 were reviewed. Patients were grouped into seven categories of distinctive diagnoses. Descriptive data for each group were extracted to determine epidemiological patterns of disorder diagnosis, voice handicap, voice quality severity, age, and gender. For patients who completed at least three treatment sessions, pre- and posttreatment measurements of two assessments, the Voice Handicap Index (VHI) and the Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI), were extracted and compared using a multivariate analysis of variance.

Results: Records from 454 consecutive patient referrals over a 50-month time period were reviewed. The most frequent diagnoses were multifactorial etiologies or those with only a few cases, categorized collectively as an "other" diagnosis category. Diagnoses of nonspecific dysphonia and mid-membranous lesions were also common. Consensus Auditory Perceptual Evaluation of Voice-scale scores were not different among disorders; however, group differences were found for VHI and AVQI. Treatment data were available for 292 patients, with 47 of those patients completing at least three treatment sessions and with data for pre- and posttreatment VHI and AVQI. A mixed multivariate analysis of variance showed a significant effect of treatment (Wilks' Lambda = 0.42, F[2] = 27.58, P < 0.001, ƞp² = 0.58), where both AVQI and VHI improved significantly across the pre- to posttreatment measurements.

Conclusions: Patient characteristics and diagnosis patterns across a 50-month period were similar when compared to a previous study that investigated epidemiological patterns in this clinic across 28 months. Voice therapy administered in this community voice clinic to patients with varied diagnoses was found to be effective based on changes in VHI and AVQI measurements.

Keywords: Effectiveness; Perceived voice handicap; Private practice voice clinic; Voice quality; Voice therapy.

MeSH terms

  • Dysphonia* / diagnosis
  • Humans
  • Private Practice
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Speech Acoustics*
  • Speech Production Measurement
  • Treatment Outcome