Format

Send to

Choose Destination
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Feb 21;8(2):e12229. doi: 10.2196/12229.

A Framework for Competencies for the Use of Mobile Technologies in Psychiatry and Medicine: Scoping Review.

Author information

1
VA Northern California Health Care System, Mental Health & Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, UC Davis School of Medicine, Mather, CA, United States.
2
Palo Alto VA Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, United States.
3
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Psychiatry, Harvard School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.
4
Consultation-Liaison & Emergency Psychiatry, UC Irvine Department of Psychiatry, UCI Health, Irvine, CA, United States.
5
Harvard Longwood Psychiatry Residency Training Program, Brigham and Women's/Faulkner Hospitals, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
#
Contributed equally

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

To ensure quality care, clinicians need skills, knowledge, and attitudes related to technology that can be measured.

OBJECTIVE:

This paper sought out competencies for mobile technologies and/or an approach to define them.

METHODS:

A scoping review was conducted to answer the following research question, "What skills are needed for clinicians and trainees to provide quality care via mHealth, have they been published, and how can they be made measurable and reproducible to teach and assess them?" The review was conducted in accordance with the 6-stage scoping review process starting with a keyword search in PubMed/Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, APA PsycNET, Cochrane, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Scopus. The literature search focused on keywords in 4 concept areas: (1) competencies, (2) mobile technologies, (3) telemedicine mode, and (4) health. Moreover, 2 authors independently, in parallel, screened the search results for potentially relevant studies based on titles and abstracts. The authors reviewed the full-text articles for final inclusion based on inclusion/exclusion criteria. Inclusion criteria were keywords used from concept area 1 (competencies) and 2 (mobile technologies) and either 3 (telemedicine mode) or 4 (health). Exclusion criteria included, but were not limited to, keywords used from a concept area in isolation, discussion of skills abstractly, outline or listing of what clinicians need without detail, and listing immeasurable behaviors.

RESULTS:

From a total of 1232 results, the authors found 78 papers eligible for a full-text review and found 14 papers directly relevant to the 4 key concepts. Although few studies specifically discussed skills, the majority were clinical studies, and the literature included no lists of measurable behaviors or competency sets for mobile technology. Therefore, a framework for mobile technology competencies was built according to the review, expert consensus, and recommendations of the Institute of Medicine's Health Professions Education Summit and Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education framework. This framework borrows from existing competency framework domains in telepsychiatry and social media (patient care, medical knowledge, practice-based learning and improvement, systems-based practice, professionalism, and interpersonal skills and communication) and added domains of mHealth clinical decision support, device/technology assessment/selection, and information flow management across an electronic health record platform. mHealth Asynchronous components require additional traditional learning, teaching, supervisory and evaluation practices. Interactive curricula with case-, problem-, and system-based teaching may help faculty focus on decision making and shape skills and attitudes to complement clinical exposure.

CONCLUSIONS:

Research is needed on how to customize implementation and evaluation of mHealth competencies and to ensure skill development is linked to the quality of care. This will require the management of organizational change with technology and the creation of a positive electronic culture in a complex policy and regulatory environment.

KEYWORDS:

apps; behavior; competency; education; framework; health; mobile; mobile phone; outcome; technology

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for JMIR Publications Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center