Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Crit Care Med. 2020 Mar 1. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004290. [Epub ahead of print]

Burnout in Pediatric Critical Care Medicine Fellows.

Author information

1
Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH.
2
Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
3
The Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH.
4
Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, St. Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
5
Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
6
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
7
Division of Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI.
8
Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI.
9
Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital at Montefiore, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY.
10
Harbor-UCLA Medical Center and Los Angeles Biomedical Institute, and David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Torrance, CA.
11
Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
12
Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

Assess the overall level of burnout in pediatric critical care medicine fellows and examine factors that may contribute to or protect against its development.

DESIGN:

Cross-sectional observational study.

SETTING:

Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited pediatric critical care medicine fellowship programs across the United States.

SUBJECTS:

Pediatric critical care medicine fellows and program directors.

INTERVENTIONS:

Web-based survey that assessed burnout via the Maslach Burnout Inventory, as well as other measures that elicited demographics, sleepiness, social support, perceptions about prior training, relationships with colleagues, and environmental burnout.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:

One-hundred eighty-seven fellows and 47 program directors participated. Fellows from 30% of programs were excluded due to lack of program director participation. Average values on each burnout domain for fellows were higher than published values for other medical professionals. Personal accomplishment was greater (lower burnout) among fellows more satisfied with their career choice (β 9.319; p ≤ 0.0001), spiritual fellows (β 1.651; p = 0.0286), those with a stress outlet (β 3.981; p = 0.0226), those comfortable discussing educational topics with faculty (β 3.078; p = 0.0197), and those comfortable seeking support from their co-fellows (β 3.762; p = 0.0006). Depersonalization was higher for second year fellows (β 2.034; p = 0.0482), those with less educational debt (β -2.920; p = 0.0115), those neutral/dissatisfied with their career choice (β -6.995; p = 0.0031), those with nursing conflict (β -3.527; p = 0.0067), those who perceived burnout among co-fellows (β 1.803; p = 0.0352), and those from ICUs with an increased number of patient beds (β 5.729; p ≤ 0.0001). Emotional exhaustion was higher among women (β 2.933; p = 0.0237), those neutral/dissatisfied with their career choice (β -7.986; p = 0.0353), and those who perceived burnout among co-fellows (β 5.698; p ≤ 0.0001). Greater sleepiness correlated with higher burnout by means of lower personal accomplishment (r = -1.64; p = 0.0255) and higher emotional exhaustion (r = 0.246; p = 0.0007). Except for tangible support, all other forms of social support showed a small to moderate correlation with lower burnout.

CONCLUSIONS:

Pediatric critical care medicine fellows in the United States are experiencing high levels of burnout, which appears to be influenced by demographics, fellow perceptions of their work environment, and satisfaction with career choice. The exclusion of fellows at 30% of the programs may have over or underestimated the actual level of burnout in these trainees.

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wolters Kluwer
Loading ...
Support Center