Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2020 Feb;63(Supplement):S34-S40. doi: 10.4103/IJPM.IJPM_568_18.

Histopathology of nonspecific granulomatous prostatitis with special reference to eosinophilic epithelial metaplasia: Pathophysiologic, diagnostic and differential diagnostic correlations.

Author information

1
Service d'Anatomie et Cytologie Pathologiques, Groupement Hospitalier de l'Est Francilien, Hôpital de Jossigny, France; Department of General and Clinical Pathology, Medical University - Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
2
Department of General and Clinical Pathology, Medical University - Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
3
Service d'Anatomie et Cytologie Pathologiques, Groupement Hospitalier de l'Est Francilien, Hôpital de Jossigny, France.
4
Department of Medical Biology, Medical University of Plovdiv; Technological Center for Emergency Medicine, Plovdiv, Bulgaria.

Abstract

Background:

Recently, we publish two case reports about association of nonspecific granulomatous prostatitis (NSGP) and eosinophilic metaplasia (EM) in benign prostatic epithelium. There is no investigation of large series of this association in medical literature. Aim of the current study is to investigate the frequency of association of NSGP and prostatic EM in a large series of cases and their relationship with the basic prostate pathology: benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), National Institutes of Health-category IV prostatitis (so-called histologic prostatitis (HP)), and prostatic adenocarcinoma (PCa).

Materials and Methods:

A retrospective record review for NSGP was performed on a total of 2366 prostatic specimens of all types of material. All cases of NSGP were reviewed for the presence of EM, BPH, and HP. NSGP with EM-cases and control cases with high grade PCa with endocrine differentiation (so-called Paneth cell-like changes) were evaluated immunohistochemically.

Results:

NSGP was found in nine cases (0.38%). EM was detected in benign perigranulomatous secretory epithelial cells in 100% of cases with NSGP and were closely associated with BPH and HP. Immunohistochemically, in 55.5% of cases with EM, there was weak focal apical false-positive staining for p504s.

Conclusion:

EM is a very common lesion in NSGP and reflects histologically a nonspecific cellular response, connected with repeated inflammation, in close relation with BPH and HP. We speculate that EM might serve as a morphological precursor of the immunologic phase of NSGP. This constant morphological finding could facilitate the histopathological differential diagnosis of NSGP with other types of granulomatous prostatitis and high grade PCa with or without endocrine differentiation.

KEYWORDS:

Eosinophilic metaplasia; Paneth cell-like changes; inflammation; prostate; prostatitis

PMID:
32108624
DOI:
10.4103/IJPM.IJPM_568_18
Free full text

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Medknow Publications and Media Pvt Ltd
Loading ...
Support Center