Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Osteoporos Int. 2020 Feb 10. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-05252-8. [Epub ahead of print]

Hip protectors are cost-effective in the prevention of hip fractures in patients with high fracture risk.

Author information

1
Department of Orthopaedics, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, NL-6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands. rtaldebot@gmail.com.
2
Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Department of Health Services Research, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, NL-6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands. rtaldebot@gmail.com.
3
Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Department of Health Services Research, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, NL-6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
4
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Zuyderland Medical Center Heerlen, H. Dunantstraat 5, NL-6419 PC, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
5
Department of Orthopaedics, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, NL-6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Abstract

Cost-effective preventive interventions are necessary for tackling the increasing number of hip fractures, which are frequently occuring as a serious consequence of osteoporosis. Several interventions have been available for preventing and treating osteoporosis. The aim of this study was to systematically review and critically appraise studies that assessed cost-effectiveness of hip protectors for the prevention of hip fractures and to investigate the effects of age, gender and residence situation on cost-effectiveness. A systematic review was conducted in order to identify economic evaluation studies examining the hip protector solely or compared to no treatment according to the Preferred Reported Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Synthesis of results was performed to observe trends between the studies. Methodological quality of the studies was assessed by the use of the Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES) instrument. A total of 15 economic evaluation studies were included for analysis. The methodological quality was high in most studies (13/15). The hip protector was solely evaluated in three studies and within 12 other studies compared with no intervention. All studies that investigated the cost-effectiveness in long-term care facilities revealed that hip protector use is a cost-effective strategy for the prevention of hip fractures in elderly. Cost-effectiveness was also observed in two studies that provided hip protectors in a geriatric hospital ward. Four studies included both community-dwelling residents and residents living in a long-term care facility in their study. These studies showed more variability regarding cost-effectiveness. One study did not report information regarding the residence situation of their cohort, but also observed cost-effectiveness. In conclusion, this review suggests that hip protectors are a cost-effective approach in the prevention of hip fractures in populations with high risk of hip fractures especially in long-term care facilities and a geriatric ward in a hospital.

KEYWORDS:

Cost-effectiveness; Hip fractures; Hip protectors; Osteoporosis

PMID:
32040600
DOI:
10.1007/s00198-019-05252-8

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Springer
Loading ...
Support Center