Psychotherapists' perspectives on collaboration and stepped care in outpatient psychotherapy-A qualitative study

PLoS One. 2020 Feb 5;15(2):e0228748. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228748. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

Objective: Stepped and collaborative care with outpatient psychotherapy as one treatment step is guideline-recommended for mental health care. To date, the experiences and evaluation of psychotherapists regarding collaboration and stepped care have been neglected. In order to improve collaborative mental health care, this qualitative study aimed at identifying psychotherapists' perspectives and needs within collaboration and stepped care.

Methods: Semi-structured qualitative interviews with 20 German outpatient psychotherapists were conducted and analyzed applying thematic analysis. The analysis was realized in a recursive process to first identify themes and then relate these themes back to the research questions with regard to collaboration and stepped care.

Results: Collaboration mainly took place in small networks, with general practitioners and psychiatrists as the most important partners and psychotherapists wishing to intensify collaboration. Main barriers for collaboration were seen in deficient resources and remuneration and in a perceived lack of esteem by other medical specialties. Stepped care was appreciated for intensified collaboration and low-threshold access to care. Doubts were cast on its implementation within current health care conditions, worries concerned a primacy of economic principles instead of patient-orientation. Among further needs, psychotherapists demanded increased knowledge about psychotherapy, especially among general practitioners.

Conclusion: Psychotherapists expressed ambivalent attitudes towards stepped and collaborative care, substantially influenced by health care conditions and the perceived own standing among care providers. Psychotherapists' needs within stepped care comprise intensified collaboration, sufficient time, personal and financial resources for collaboration and opportunities for a constructive interprofessional dialogue.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03226743.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Delivery of Health Care / methods*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Intersectoral Collaboration*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Outpatients*
  • Psychotherapy*
  • Qualitative Research*
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT03226743

Grants and funding

The PhD position of KM and the position of DH are funded for the most part but not exclusively by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF, https://www.bmbf.de/en/index.html) as part of the trial COMET (Collaborative and Stepped Care in Mental Health by Overcoming Treatment Sector Barriers) within the Hamburg Network of Health Services Research (HAM-NET; grant no. 01GY1602; NCT03226743). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.